Mikusinski Notesby George Schils This page discusses some elements of operational calculus found in the book Operational Calculus, Lectures given by A. Erdelyi, Mathematics Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1955.
It is not in final form, and there may be errors. |
|||||
Mikusinski notes. This page is under development. |
|||||
In Mikusinski operational calculus, results appear to the the
same as with Laplace transforms. However, the meanings of the
equations are very different. For example, in the equation below
the variable What this means more precisely is that when both sides are
multiplied by Multiplication here means convolution: it is not ordinary multiplication. To further understand the above result, we now note the derivative theorem. This form is the same as with Laplace transforms. It says to
differentiate a function Performing this operation on the equation after Eq. (1) then gives This is not a proof, but we have performed a few simple manipulations to show the plausibility of the result in Eq. (1). It is shown that the exponential function has a reasonable
interpretation for reasonable functions. That is, if Here The entity This relation holds for any integrable function To see how Eq. (1) is a Laplace transform relation, we proceed
as follows. Using equation (4) with the function The first and third elements of this equation give the more familiar form of the Laplace transform. We again note that the variable s here is not a complex variable as in Laplace analysis, but instead is the name for a certain generalized function which is a kind of differential operator. Thus there is an exact similarity between Laplace transforms and Mikusinski operational calculus. This allows tables of Laplace transforms to be used in this kind of operational calculus. The s operator was seen above to be an interesting generalized function. It is very close to the differentiation operator. Now we present some results for Bessel functions. These involve
even more obscure functions of and Doing a manipulation similar to that in Eq. (5), we see that the Laplace transforms of the right hand sides of the above two equations gives the left hand sides. This is the more familiar Laplace transform interpretation. Some even more obscure results are derived. and Eqs. (8) and (9) can be rearranged so that This section will contain results on the error function
|
Copyright © 2005-2007 George Schils.
All rights reserved.