Mikusinski Notesby George Schils This page discusses some elements of operational calculus found in the book Operational Calculus, Lectures given by A. Erdelyi, Mathematics Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1955.
It is not in final form, and there may be errors. |
|||||
Mikusinski notes. This page is under development. |
|||||
In Mikusinski operational calculus, results appear to the the same as with Laplace transforms. However, the meanings of the equations are very different. For example, in the equation below the variable is not a complex variable as with Laplace transforms, but is the operational function , which is the inverse of integration, and which is roughly equivalent to the operation of differentiation. What this means more precisely is that when both sides are multiplied by the identity function results. This identity function is not the function which is one everywhere, but is the generalized-function identity function, or the delta function. Multiplication here means convolution: it is not ordinary multiplication. To further understand the above result, we now note the derivative theorem. This form is the same as with Laplace transforms. It says to differentiate a function , one convolves with the differentiation operator and then subtracts the initial value. Alternatively multiplying by is equivalent to differentiating and adding the initial value: Performing this operation on the equation after Eq. (1) then gives This is not a proof, but we have performed a few simple manipulations to show the plausibility of the result in Eq. (1). It is shown that the exponential function has a reasonable interpretation for reasonable functions. That is, if is an integrable function, then Here refers to the convolution of the function with itself, and is the ordinary power of the number . The entity does not have an expansion as above, which makes sense since is not an integrable function. What holds, instead is the identity This relation holds for any integrable function , no matter what the growth rate of is. This is a Laplace transform like relation which holds true regardless of the growth rate of . This essentially says that a function is the Laplace transform of itself. In Mikusinski operational calculus there are no two domains as there are in ordinary Laplace transforms. To see how Eq. (1) is a Laplace transform relation, we proceed as follows. Using equation (4) with the function , and also using Eq. (1), we obtain The first and third elements of this equation give the more familiar form of the Laplace transform. We again note that the variable s here is not a complex variable as in Laplace analysis, but instead is the name for a certain generalized function which is a kind of differential operator. Thus there is an exact similarity between Laplace transforms and Mikusinski operational calculus. This allows tables of Laplace transforms to be used in this kind of operational calculus. The s operator was seen above to be an interesting generalized function. It is very close to the differentiation operator. Now we present some results for Bessel functions. These involve even more obscure functions of . and Doing a manipulation similar to that in Eq. (5), we see that the Laplace transforms of the right hand sides of the above two equations gives the left hand sides. This is the more familiar Laplace transform interpretation. Some even more obscure results are derived. and Eqs. (8) and (9) can be rearranged so that appears on one side and on the other side. Doing so gives appropriate Laplace transform relationships. (We leave this as an exercise for the reader.) This section will contain results on the error function , and on related functions. |
Copyright © 2005-2007 George Schils.
All rights reserved.